Difference between revisions of "Talk:Louie Louie"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
- Mr. Category | - Mr. Category | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | Either that, or we'd have to make it a subcategory of [[Category:Conceptual Continuity]], which would make it | + | Either that, or we'd have to make it a subcategory of [[:Category:Conceptual Continuity]], which would make it Category:Louie Louie. I'm partial to your suggestion though, emdebe: just make a '''non'''-category page named [[Louie Louie (CC)]], and categorize it under [[:Category:Conceptual Continuity]]. Think about all the other CC stuff - it's insane to make each of those clues into a category, methinks... - [[User:KillUglyRadio|KillUglyRadio]] 05:30, 7 May 2005 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 11:25, 10 October 2021
Should we have a Louie Louie category? There's a lot to go in it!
Duncan 01:38, 7 May 2005 (PDT)
Heck, if we have a Babysitters category I can't see why we couldn't have a Louie Louie category! ;-)
KillUglyRadio 02:48, 7 May 2005 (PDT)
I can live with that... ;-)
Although it looks more like a Louie Louie (CC) to me...
- Mr. Category
Either that, or we'd have to make it a subcategory of Category:Conceptual Continuity, which would make it Category:Louie Louie. I'm partial to your suggestion though, emdebe: just make a non-category page named Louie Louie (CC), and categorize it under Category:Conceptual Continuity. Think about all the other CC stuff - it's insane to make each of those clues into a category, methinks... - KillUglyRadio 05:30, 7 May 2005 (PDT)
