Difference between revisions of "Zappa Wiki Jawaka"
m (→Mainstream notability: Tweak) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Mainstream notability== | ==Mainstream notability== | ||
| − | During the fund raising for the movie/vault | + | During the fund raising for the movie/vault archiving project [[Who the F*@% is Frank Zappa?]] Alex Winter divulged his enjoyment of Zappa Wiki Jawaka...: ''"This isn't my own research — all these great quotes from Nando are from off the extremely robust Zappa Wiki Jawaka, which I thoroughly enjoy."'' <ref>https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/alexwinter/frank-zappa/posts/1520125</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | Alas such praise is not universal. The editors at Wikipedia decided that this wiki was of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Frank_Zappa/Archive_3#External_link_to_Wiki_Jawaka limited value] due to the lack of a robust editorial policy and the limited number of editors. A trend that continues as a single editor can daily spam so many articles that it becomes an onerous task for other editors to work through them all correcting all the spelling/typo mistakes, factual inaccuracies, or discuss whether tabloid sensationalism deserves equal weighting as verifiable content. etc. All of which devalues the work as a whole. | ||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
Revision as of 01:40, 27 November 2020
Zappa Wiki Jawaka is a Wiki about Frank Zappa. It was established in 2005.
Mainstream notability
During the fund raising for the movie/vault archiving project Who the F*@% is Frank Zappa? Alex Winter divulged his enjoyment of Zappa Wiki Jawaka...: "This isn't my own research — all these great quotes from Nando are from off the extremely robust Zappa Wiki Jawaka, which I thoroughly enjoy." [1]
Alas such praise is not universal. The editors at Wikipedia decided that this wiki was of limited value due to the lack of a robust editorial policy and the limited number of editors. A trend that continues as a single editor can daily spam so many articles that it becomes an onerous task for other editors to work through them all correcting all the spelling/typo mistakes, factual inaccuracies, or discuss whether tabloid sensationalism deserves equal weighting as verifiable content. etc. All of which devalues the work as a whole.
