Difference between revisions of "Zappa Wiki Jawaka talk:Image use policy"
m |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There are some HUGE pictures in there (Johnny Otis is a case in point)...<br> | There are some HUGE pictures in there (Johnny Otis is a case in point)...<br> | ||
Can we go for a "one size fits all"?<br> | Can we go for a "one size fits all"?<br> | ||
| + | |||
--[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 11:41, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT) | --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 11:41, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Should we make all the articles the same size too? You can make the images clickable thumbnails which may be preferable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Dunk|Dunk]] 15:25, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Naaah I don't think we need to impose px dimensions on regular pictures, since the unpredictable nature of the pic (might be a close-up, might be a building, etc) makes it hard to impose a standard - plus there's the option of thumbnailing the picture. Album cover art though: there I think we have to impose the 150x150px standard. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:KillUglyRadio|KillUglyRadio]] 10:11, 4 Jun 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Basically I tried to say 2 things, but none of them got through (my fault):<br> | ||
| + | 1) Why put limits (copyrights?) on the FZ stuff, and then give all space to less important things?<br> | ||
| + | 2) Why not set a maximum "''something''" for all pictures?<br> | ||
| + | So, not all pictures must have the same size, just some maximum size...<br> | ||
| + | Anyway, it's probably not important, I guess... | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 10:25, 4 Jun 2005 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:25, 4 June 2005
"When uploading album cover art adhere to a size of 150x150px if you can."
Maybe it would be a good thing to limit the size of other "illustrations" as well...
There are some HUGE pictures in there (Johnny Otis is a case in point)...
Can we go for a "one size fits all"?
--Emdebe 11:41, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT)
Should we make all the articles the same size too? You can make the images clickable thumbnails which may be preferable.
Dunk 15:25, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT)
Naaah I don't think we need to impose px dimensions on regular pictures, since the unpredictable nature of the pic (might be a close-up, might be a building, etc) makes it hard to impose a standard - plus there's the option of thumbnailing the picture. Album cover art though: there I think we have to impose the 150x150px standard.
KillUglyRadio 10:11, 4 Jun 2005 (PDT)
Basically I tried to say 2 things, but none of them got through (my fault):
1) Why put limits (copyrights?) on the FZ stuff, and then give all space to less important things?
2) Why not set a maximum "something" for all pictures?
So, not all pictures must have the same size, just some maximum size...
Anyway, it's probably not important, I guess...
--Emdebe 10:25, 4 Jun 2005 (PDT)
