Difference between revisions of "Talk:John Tasker Howard"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Oops... forgot to "redo" the copywrited stuff... Again... When I come to think of it: I won't redo it (again), because the stuff that was removed could indeed be depicted as "irrelevant"... When I come to think of it, again, much of what is already been posted could be depicted as "irrelevant"... Sometimes there’s only a thin line between "relevancy" and "irrelevancy"... --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 09:16, 18 May 2005 (PDT) | Oops... forgot to "redo" the copywrited stuff... Again... When I come to think of it: I won't redo it (again), because the stuff that was removed could indeed be depicted as "irrelevant"... When I come to think of it, again, much of what is already been posted could be depicted as "irrelevant"... Sometimes there’s only a thin line between "relevancy" and "irrelevancy"... --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 09:16, 18 May 2005 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Without exception an analysis and/or evaluation of primary and secondary sources will be irrelevant to the Zappa Wiki. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 11:40, 18 May 2005 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 10:40, 18 May 2005
Oops... forgot to "redo" the copywrited stuff... Again... When I come to think of it: I won't redo it (again), because the stuff that was removed could indeed be depicted as "irrelevant"... When I come to think of it, again, much of what is already been posted could be depicted as "irrelevant"... Sometimes there’s only a thin line between "relevancy" and "irrelevancy"... --Emdebe 09:16, 18 May 2005 (PDT)
Without exception an analysis and/or evaluation of primary and secondary sources will be irrelevant to the Zappa Wiki.
Duncan 11:40, 18 May 2005 (PDT)