Difference between revisions of "Talk:John Tasker Howard"

From Zappa Wiki Jawaka
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Oops... forgot to "redo" the copywrited stuff... Again... When I come to think of it: I won't redo it (again), because the stuff that was removed could indeed be depicted as "irrelevant"... When I come to think of it, again, much of what is already been posted could be depicted as "irrelevant"... Sometimes there’s only a thin line between "relevancy" and "irrelevancy"... --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 09:16, 18 May 2005 (PDT)
 
Oops... forgot to "redo" the copywrited stuff... Again... When I come to think of it: I won't redo it (again), because the stuff that was removed could indeed be depicted as "irrelevant"... When I come to think of it, again, much of what is already been posted could be depicted as "irrelevant"... Sometimes there’s only a thin line between "relevancy" and "irrelevancy"... --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 09:16, 18 May 2005 (PDT)
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Without exception an analysis and/or evaluation of primary and secondary sources will be irrelevant to the Zappa Wiki.
 +
 +
[[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 11:40, 18 May 2005 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 10:40, 18 May 2005

Oops... forgot to "redo" the copywrited stuff... Again... When I come to think of it: I won't redo it (again), because the stuff that was removed could indeed be depicted as "irrelevant"... When I come to think of it, again, much of what is already been posted could be depicted as "irrelevant"... Sometimes there’s only a thin line between "relevancy" and "irrelevancy"... --Emdebe 09:16, 18 May 2005 (PDT)


Without exception an analysis and/or evaluation of primary and secondary sources will be irrelevant to the Zappa Wiki.

Duncan 11:40, 18 May 2005 (PDT)