Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quaudiophiliac"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== No subwoofer track? == | == No subwoofer track? == | ||
− | Many people reported they could hear no sound coming from the subwoofer, and several argued this could be a 5.0 or a 4.0 mix. | + | Many people reported they could hear no sound coming from the [[Wikipedia:Subwoofer|subwoofer]], and several argued this could be a 5.0 or a 4.0 mix. |
− | However I had serious doubts it could be "the original 4-channel Quadraphonic mix" because I did get music on the center channel anyway. | + | However I had serious doubts it could be "the original 4-channel [[Wikipedia:Quadraphonic|Quadraphonic]] mix" because I did get music on the center channel anyway. |
So I looked for explanations and found [http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_7_2/feature-article-misunderstood-lfe-channel-april-2000.html an interesting article]. | So I looked for explanations and found [http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_7_2/feature-article-misunderstood-lfe-channel-april-2000.html an interesting article]. | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*DTS use a [[Wikipedia:LFE|Low Frequency Effects "0.1" channel]] | *DTS use a [[Wikipedia:LFE|Low Frequency Effects "0.1" channel]] | ||
*The subwoofer renders a calculated mix of the LFE channel and deep bass sounds from the 5 other channels | *The subwoofer renders a calculated mix of the LFE channel and deep bass sounds from the 5 other channels | ||
− | *LFE and bass in the cutoff range (set to 35- | + | *LFE and bass in the cutoff range (set to 35-50[[Wikipedia:Hertz|Hz]] on my system) are not always needed in music |
*DTS is still called a 5.1 format even when the subwoofer is not activated | *DTS is still called a 5.1 format even when the subwoofer is not activated | ||
This may partly explain the mismatch between the original tape box photograph in the liner notes and on the disc itself? | This may partly explain the mismatch between the original tape box photograph in the liner notes and on the disc itself? | ||
− | *The tape box 1970 writings seem to be anachronisms: "Left, Front/Center, Right & Rear" are only used by 80's Dolby Matrixed systems | + | *The tape box 1970 writings seem to be anachronisms: "Left, Front/Center, Right & Rear" are only used by 80's [[Wikipedia:Dolby Pro Logic|Dolby Matrixed systems]] |
*The disc mentions: "Front Left, Front Right, Rear Left & Rear Right" like were Quadraphonic systems | *The disc mentions: "Front Left, Front Right, Rear Left & Rear Right" like were Quadraphonic systems | ||
My guess is that the whole album has been remixed to 5.1 DTS. | My guess is that the whole album has been remixed to 5.1 DTS. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Maroual|Maroual]] 10:40, 7 Jul 2006 (PDT) |
Revision as of 09:40, 7 July 2006
QuAUDIOPHILIAc? - emdebe
This now redirects...
KillUglyRadio 23:14, 30 Mar 2005 (PST)
No subwoofer track?
Many people reported they could hear no sound coming from the subwoofer, and several argued this could be a 5.0 or a 4.0 mix.
However I had serious doubts it could be "the original 4-channel Quadraphonic mix" because I did get music on the center channel anyway.
So I looked for explanations and found an interesting article.
I understand from it there is actually no "subwoofer track" in DTS:
- DTS use a Low Frequency Effects "0.1" channel
- The subwoofer renders a calculated mix of the LFE channel and deep bass sounds from the 5 other channels
- LFE and bass in the cutoff range (set to 35-50Hz on my system) are not always needed in music
- DTS is still called a 5.1 format even when the subwoofer is not activated
This may partly explain the mismatch between the original tape box photograph in the liner notes and on the disc itself?
- The tape box 1970 writings seem to be anachronisms: "Left, Front/Center, Right & Rear" are only used by 80's Dolby Matrixed systems
- The disc mentions: "Front Left, Front Right, Rear Left & Rear Right" like were Quadraphonic systems
My guess is that the whole album has been remixed to 5.1 DTS.
Maroual 10:40, 7 Jul 2006 (PDT)