Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Videography"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(videography vs filmography?) |
(Pellicule vs video) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Why do we call it "Videography", if we are using the term "(the Film)"? Probably only [[200 Motels]] deserves the title "Film"... all others are IMHO "(the Video)"... - emdebe | Why do we call it "Videography", if we are using the term "(the Film)"? Probably only [[200 Motels]] deserves the title "Film"... all others are IMHO "(the Video)"... - emdebe | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Pellicule vs video == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Baby Snakes (The Film)]] is not a "film"? | ||
+ | |||
+ | The distinction between pellicule and video is very very technical if you ask me; and won't be noticed anyway by most who search the wiki. Would like to hear other's point of view though. | ||
+ | |||
+ | -- KUR |
Revision as of 09:34, 28 March 2005
Hey
Thank you so much for deleting my entries.
Retrieved your entry
Hi Rdnzl,
My mistake, sorry!
Your entries were not really deleted though - they're not lost. Even pages that have been deleted can have their content retrieved by looking up their history. Which is what I've done.
-- KUR
What's in a name?
Why do we call it "Videography", if we are using the term "(the Film)"? Probably only 200 Motels deserves the title "Film"... all others are IMHO "(the Video)"... - emdebe
Pellicule vs video
Baby Snakes (The Film) is not a "film"?
The distinction between pellicule and video is very very technical if you ask me; and won't be noticed anyway by most who search the wiki. Would like to hear other's point of view though.
-- KUR