Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Discography"
m |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
With some tracks an obsolete Disco-category tag was removed. - emdebe | With some tracks an obsolete Disco-category tag was removed. - emdebe | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Sources == | ||
| + | A titan work which could be useful => http://www.bsnpubs.com/discog.html<br> | ||
| + | [[User:Maroual|Maroual]] 17:23, 24 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 24 May 2006
"Of course, this list is completely useless."
Sorry emdebe but that's just your opinion, so I edited it out. For some, this list will be very useful (myself included).
-- KUR
Contents
Let's not get too personal in articles
Edited out text that was too subjective/personal IMO, see guidelines with regard to editing articles at the Main Page.
-- KUR
Resp
Have I offended someone? That was ment to be FUNNY... The next time I will use an OVERSIZED EMOTICON! - emdebe
Subcategories
Should we make subcategories under "Zappa Per Album"? There's already a Category:Compilations which was created by emdebe if I'm correct. So then it seems logical to create other indexes, such as Sixties, Seventies, Eighties, Nineties, 2000s... or not? Your thoughts? -- User:KillUglyRadio
Tracks listed as Albums?
Little House, Nine Types and WPLJ (possibly others) are listed with the albums although categorised as Tracks. Should they be (some obscure Belgian compilation perhaps) or is this some techno problem?
Duncan 01:19, 9 Apr 2005 (PDT)
With some tracks an obsolete Disco-category tag was removed. - emdebe
Sources
A titan work which could be useful => http://www.bsnpubs.com/discog.html
Maroual 17:23, 24 May 2006 (PDT)
