Difference between revisions of "Talk:Advertising"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Response) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
At least now we can see how many articles are present on this wiki about topics that have only minimal information present in their infoboxes. Zappa often referred to advertising and products. And there are enough topics listed here to prove that it's not a matter of only a few examples. [[User: Spider of Destiny]] | At least now we can see how many articles are present on this wiki about topics that have only minimal information present in their infoboxes. Zappa often referred to advertising and products. And there are enough topics listed here to prove that it's not a matter of only a few examples. [[User: Spider of Destiny]] | ||
| − | :It is not the purpose of the wiki to prove anything. If it worth an article write an article. [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 16:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC) | + | :It is not the purpose of the wiki to prove anything. If it is worth an article write an article. [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 16:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:41, 2 January 2011
Yet another pointless mishmash of a page. Since when has designing greeting cards been considered working in advertising? Why the list of companies? Most of the albums songs listed seem to be rather point of view dubious/debatable. Zappa had nothing to do with the toilet poster etc. etc. As with many of these recent additions there is an element of interpretation rather than statements of fact. Duncan 15:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
At least now we can see how many articles are present on this wiki about topics that have only minimal information present in their infoboxes. Zappa often referred to advertising and products. And there are enough topics listed here to prove that it's not a matter of only a few examples. User: Spider of Destiny
- It is not the purpose of the wiki to prove anything. If it is worth an article write an article. Duncan 16:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
