Difference between revisions of "Talk:Asshole"
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0006V6TLM/qid=1114158578/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/202-1977488-7401449 | http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0006V6TLM/qid=1114158578/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/202-1977488-7401449 | ||
+ | [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 01:32, 22 Apr 2005 (PDT) | ||
− | + | ---- | |
+ | I just made an Asshole page without a problem. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Apart from the above quote being one of the funniest things I've read here in a while, just where is this Asshole page you created? Should this page (---hole) be deleted in favour of the Asshole page you created? |
Revision as of 03:05, 22 April 2005
Is this not called Asshole? What would FZ say to see such censorious marketing accepted and presented in his own wiki?
Duncan 22:45, 21 Apr 2005 (PDT)
Did the wiki system do this?! If so, I'll have to dig through some files to find the censoring culprit!
KillUglyRadio 00:21, 22 Apr 2005 (PDT)
No it is not the wiki. I just made an Asshole page without a problem. It's the curse of cutting and pasting.
Amazon uk list the title as Asshole but list the track as ***hole!
but they have no qualms about Martha Wainwright...
Duncan 01:32, 22 Apr 2005 (PDT)
I just made an Asshole page without a problem.
Apart from the above quote being one of the funniest things I've read here in a while, just where is this Asshole page you created? Should this page (---hole) be deleted in favour of the Asshole page you created?