Difference between revisions of "Talk:Joe's Garage Act I"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Should there be a section for the Plot of the album? == | == Should there be a section for the Plot of the album? == | ||
Well... There's my question. You already know it. --[[User:The Central Scrutinizer|The Central Scrutinizer]] 16:38, 14 Jun 2006 (PDT) | Well... There's my question. You already know it. --[[User:The Central Scrutinizer|The Central Scrutinizer]] 16:38, 14 Jun 2006 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | I guess so ;-) Maybe this should be included in a subsection in order to preserve the existing "standard" layout. Please just make sure to avoid personal judgements and only write verified information. [[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]], [[User:Ducan|Duncan]], do you agree?<br>[[User:Maroual|Maroual]] 23:16, 14 Jun 2006 (PDT) |
Revision as of 22:16, 14 June 2006
IF London Symphony Orchestra Vol. I
AND London Symphony Orchestra Vol. II
THEN also Joe's Garage, Act I
AND Joe's Garage, Acts II & III
- emdebe
Resp
I mentioned this during the Sunday chat; Sharleena wrote it down... I just don't think Barry has had a chance to impliment it yet.
-- SOFA
Fixed.
Acts II & III now have their own page (yes I hadn't come around to editing this...)
Should there be a section for the Plot of the album?
Well... There's my question. You already know it. --The Central Scrutinizer 16:38, 14 Jun 2006 (PDT)
I guess so ;-) Maybe this should be included in a subsection in order to preserve the existing "standard" layout. Please just make sure to avoid personal judgements and only write verified information. Emdebe, Duncan, do you agree?
Maroual 23:16, 14 Jun 2006 (PDT)