Difference between revisions of "Talk:Album Grouping"
(→Resp) |
m (→Resp) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I do appreciate the intended funniness, but the wiki's goal is definitely not to be a personal homepage, sorry... | I do appreciate the intended funniness, but the wiki's goal is definitely not to be a personal homepage, sorry... | ||
| − | Ideally, for an anonymous visitor, I would like there to be as little as possible "personality" present in | + | Ideally, for an anonymous visitor, I would like there to be as little as possible "personality" present in (or in the way of) the articles. The wiki is just not the place for it. What I would like there to be: |
* Objectivity | * Objectivity | ||
* Information | * Information | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 25 March 2005
Please refrain from making the articles too personal or subjective (i.e. "el classico FZ").
This wiki is NOT about one man's thoughts on FZ, it's meant to be a work of reference, hence it needs to remain fairly objective.
--KUR
Resp
Jesus Christ Superstar! What's so "personal" or "subjective" about "el classico FZ"??? Being "objective" should not be the same as being DULL... At least, that's what I thought. - emdebe
Resp
I do appreciate the intended funniness, but the wiki's goal is definitely not to be a personal homepage, sorry...
Ideally, for an anonymous visitor, I would like there to be as little as possible "personality" present in (or in the way of) the articles. The wiki is just not the place for it. What I would like there to be:
- Objectivity
- Information
Don't take it personally emdebe, this is a general remark that goes for all us who edit wiki pages...
-- KUR
