Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Discography"
(Tracks listed as Albums?) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
-- KUR | -- KUR | ||
| − | == Resp == | + | === Resp === |
Have I offended someone? That was ment to be FUNNY... The next time I will use an OVERSIZED EMOTICON! - emdebe | Have I offended someone? That was ment to be FUNNY... The next time I will use an OVERSIZED EMOTICON! - emdebe | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 01:19, 9 Apr 2005 (PDT) | [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 01:19, 9 Apr 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | With some tracks an obsolete Disco-category tag was removed. - emdebe | ||
Revision as of 04:00, 9 April 2005
"Of course, this list is completely useless."
Sorry emdebe but that's just your opinion, so I edited it out. For some, this list will be very useful (myself included).
-- KUR
Contents
Let's not get too personal in articles
Edited out text that was too subjective/personal IMO, see guidelines with regard to editing articles at the Main Page.
-- KUR
Resp
Have I offended someone? That was ment to be FUNNY... The next time I will use an OVERSIZED EMOTICON! - emdebe
Subcategories
Should we make subcategories under "Zappa Per Album"? There's already a Category:Compilations which was created by emdebe if I'm correct. So then it seems logical to create other indexes, such as Sixties, Seventies, Eighties, Nineties, 2000s... or not? Your thoughts? -- User:KillUglyRadio
Tracks listed as Albums?
Little House, Nine Types and WPLJ (possibly others) are listed with the albums although categorised as Tracks. Should they be (some obscure Belgian compilation perhaps) or is this some techno problem?
Duncan 01:19, 9 Apr 2005 (PDT)
With some tracks an obsolete Disco-category tag was removed. - emdebe
