Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Best Of Frank Zappa"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 03:06, 6 Apr 2005 (PDT) | [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 03:06, 6 Apr 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Why not list times on both the Album page ''and'' the Track page? Best of both worlds? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:KillUglyRadio|KillUglyRadio]] 03:35, 6 Apr 2005 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:35, 6 April 2005
This listing leaves the times and links to the original albums. Is this a good or bad idea? I would say it was a bad idea - but then this whole wiki thing seems to have so many bad ideas one more will not make much difference ;-)
Duncan 22:10, 5 Apr 2005 (PDT)
What's bad about the idea of listing times, and (in the case of compilations) adding links to the albums from which the tracks were taken? Just because this hasn't been implemented with every album's track-listing (yet), doesn't mean it's not good practice. As I'm the promotor of many of these "bad ideas in this whole wiki thing", you'll have to enlighten me.
KillUglyRadio 00:23, 6 Apr 2005 (PDT)
I realise I am completely out of step here and should just resign myself to accepting the imposed structure but I just wondered if the details of an individual track would be better presented under the individual listing in the Track category (where there is space to record variations etc.) rather than spilling out over other categories.
Duncan 03:06, 6 Apr 2005 (PDT)
Why not list times on both the Album page and the Track page? Best of both worlds?
KillUglyRadio 03:35, 6 Apr 2005 (PDT)
