Difference between revisions of "Talk:200 Motels"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 15:56, 5 Apr 2005 (PDT) | [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 15:56, 5 Apr 2005 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==ISRC== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The tracks [[wikipedia:International Standard Recording Code|ISRC]]s encoded onto RCD 10513/14 are: | ||
+ | {| cellspacing="30" | ||
+ | |valign="top"|'''CD1''' | ||
+ | *USMG29700001 | ||
+ | *USMG29700002 | ||
+ | *USMG29700003 | ||
+ | *USMG29700004 | ||
+ | *USMG29700005 | ||
+ | *USMG29700006 | ||
+ | *USMG29700007 | ||
+ | *USMG29700008 | ||
+ | *USMG29700009 | ||
+ | *USMG29700010 | ||
+ | *USMG29700011 | ||
+ | *USMG29700012 | ||
+ | *USMG29700013 | ||
+ | *USMG29700014 | ||
+ | *USMG29700015 | ||
+ | *USMG29700016 | ||
+ | *USMG29700017 | ||
+ | *USMG29700018 | ||
+ | *USMG29700019 | ||
+ | |valign="top"|'''CD2''' | ||
+ | *USMG29700020 | ||
+ | *USMG29700021 | ||
+ | *USMG29700022 | ||
+ | *USMG29700023 | ||
+ | *USMG29700024 | ||
+ | *USMG29700025 | ||
+ | *USMG29700026 | ||
+ | *USMG29700027 | ||
+ | *USMG29700028 | ||
+ | *USMG29700029 | ||
+ | *USMG29700030 | ||
+ | *USMG29700031 | ||
+ | *USMG29700032 | ||
+ | *USMG29700033 | ||
+ | *USMG29700034 | ||
+ | *USMG29700051 | ||
+ | *USMG29700053 | ||
+ | *USMG29700054 | ||
+ | *USMG29700056 | ||
+ | *USMG29700057 | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Availability== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[200 Motels]] seems to be widely available in retailers again. However the cover pictures resolution is inferior as if the pictures were scanned. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Maroual|Maroual]] 12:07, 30 May 2008 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 11:07, 30 May 2008
What to do with the Half A Dozen Provocative Squats link? Should this be (The Track) or that be (The Album or whatever it was) or what?
Duncan 15:56, 5 Apr 2005 (PDT)
ISRC
The tracks ISRCs encoded onto RCD 10513/14 are:
CD1
|
CD2
|
Availability
200 Motels seems to be widely available in retailers again. However the cover pictures resolution is inferior as if the pictures were scanned.
Maroual 12:07, 30 May 2008 (PDT)