User talk:Emdebe - Revision history

Jason.Kreitzer at 19:22, 10 October 2021

2021-10-10T19:22:42Z

PopFanDoug: /* FZ Seventies ASCII Artwork */ new section

2019-10-05T23:38:30Z

FZ Seventies ASCII Artwork: new section

Emdebe: /* (Please explain the relation with FZ. Tx.) */

2007-05-14T15:16:10Z

(Please explain the relation with FZ. Tx.)

Propellerkuh at 17:12, 13 May 2007

2007-05-13T17:12:14Z

Maroual at 19:17, 7 May 2007

2007-05-07T19:17:57Z

Propellerkuh at 17:10, 7 May 2007

2007-05-07T17:10:32Z

Emdebe: from the top-level admin

2007-04-14T20:38:45Z

from the top-level admin

Duncan: /* Manual vs. automatical categorizing */

2007-04-13T06:42:40Z

Manual vs. automatical categorizing

Propellerkuh: /* can't understand lyrics to "Ring Of Fire" */

2007-04-12T19:39:40Z

can't understand lyrics to "Ring Of Fire"

Propellerkuh at 19:38, 12 April 2007

2007-04-12T19:38:24Z

@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 Hi Emdebe ...
-the thing is ... I was looking at the "Wanted Pages" at [[Special:Specialpages]] and saw a lot of names, places andsuch by whoever thought fit to contribute and widen the spectrum of the Zappa-image; I tried to get rid of those red links. So it was not me to think it would be helpful to know who for example [[Art Tatum]] were; and mostly the Wanderers of the Web would surely come from some other Zappa Wiki page already knowing what connects [[William S. Burroughs]] with Zappa.
+the thing is ... I was looking at the "Wanted Pages" at [[Special:Specialpages]] and saw a lot of names, places andsuch by whoever thought fit to contribute and widen the spectrum of the Zappa-image; I tried to get rid of those red links. So it was not me to think it would be helpful to know who for example Art Tatum were; and mostly the Wanderers of the Web would surely come from some other Zappa Wiki page already knowing what connects [[William S. Burroughs]] with Zappa.
 I tried to fill in when the connection was first hand; but when the connection became a little far-fetched I let go. Should we unlink the links?
@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 == FZ Seventies ASCII Artwork ==
-I don't get the [[FZ Seventies ASCII Artwork]] page, where I've commented.  It needs some introduction, and links from other pages.  Otherwise, it might get deleted.  I hope you are still here and are reading these messages.  [[User:PopFanDoug|PopFanDoug]] ([[User talk:PopFanDoug|talk]]) 16:38, 5 October 2019 (PDT)
+I don't get the FZ Seventies ASCII Artwork page, where I've commented.  It needs some introduction, and links from other pages.  Otherwise, it might get deleted.  I hope you are still here and are reading these messages.  [[User:PopFanDoug|PopFanDoug]] ([[User talk:PopFanDoug|talk]]) 16:38, 5 October 2019 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 5 October 2019
Line 90:		Line 90:

	The more links, the more fun. As long as the relation is clear to everybody. --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 08:16, 14 May 2007 (PDT)		The more links, the more fun. As long as the relation is clear to everybody. --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 08:16, 14 May 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	== FZ Seventies ASCII Artwork ==
		+
		+	I don't get the [[FZ Seventies ASCII Artwork]] page, where I've commented. It needs some introduction, and links from other pages. Otherwise, it might get deleted. I hope you are still here and are reading these messages. [[User:PopFanDoug\|PopFanDoug]] ([[User talk:PopFanDoug\|talk]]) 16:38, 5 October 2019 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:16, 14 May 2007
Line 88:		Line 88:

	:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]]		:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]]
		+
		+	The more links, the more fun. As long as the relation is clear to everybody. --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 08:16, 14 May 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 13 May 2007
Line 80:		Line 80:

	[[User:Maroual\|Maroual]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (PDT)		[[User:Maroual\|Maroual]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (PDT)
		+	==(Please explain the relation with FZ. Tx.)==
		+	Hi Emdebe ...
		+
		+	the thing is ... I was looking at the "Wanted Pages" at [[Special:Specialpages]] and saw a lot of names, places andsuch by whoever thought fit to contribute and widen the spectrum of the Zappa-image; I tried to get rid of those red links. So it was not me to think it would be helpful to know who for example [[Art Tatum]] were; and mostly the Wanderers of the Web would surely come from some other Zappa Wiki page already knowing what connects [[William S. Burroughs]] with Zappa.
		+
		+	I tried to fill in when the connection was first hand; but when the connection became a little far-fetched I let go. Should we unlink the links?
		+
		+	:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 7 May 2007
Line 67:		Line 67:
	Please be so kind and pardon my un-scientific and hasty "Moggio"-contribution like it being an Italian village (which it indeed is) and all that Maggio and other stuff around ... and thanks for cleaning up the mess after me.<br>		Please be so kind and pardon my un-scientific and hasty "Moggio"-contribution like it being an Italian village (which it indeed is) and all that Maggio and other stuff around ... and thanks for cleaning up the mess after me.<br>
	:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]]		:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]]
		+	----
		+	Hi [[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]],
		+
		+	You're welcome.
		+
		+	[[User:Maroual\|Maroual]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	==Lyrics pages==
		+	Hi [[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]], thanks for the new songs lyrics format. It does look good and convenient.
		+
		+	The only bad thing is that it will require a shitload of work ;-)
		+
		+	[[User:Maroual\|Maroual]] 12:17, 7 May 2007 (PDT)

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 Most of the Categories start with a manual list for convenience; once all pages are tagged with the right Category, manual lists are being removed – in this case it was perhaps a bit early… Nevertheless you can still do whatever you did, when you go to a page were you can put a reference to the …(CC)-page. You can always create a new page by typing it in the address bar of your browser, like "http://wiki.killuglyradio.com/index.php/blablabla" (without the quotes), and hitting the Enter/Return key. --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 11:26, 14 Mar 2007 (PDT)
 ==Manual vs. automatical categorizing==
 Hi MDB<br>
@@ Line 72: / Line 62: @@
 but I do everything Duncan says... ;-)<br>
 --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 13:38, 14 Apr 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 14 April 2007
Line 67:		Line 67:

	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 23:42, 12 Apr 2007 (PDT)		[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 23:42, 12 Apr 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+
		+	TOP-LEVEL ADMIN, yeah, I like that.... ;-)<br>
		+	but I do everything Duncan says... ;-)<br>
		+	--[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 13:38, 14 Apr 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 13 April 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:
	As you are one of the top-level admins, I guess – let me beg you not ever to loose the chronological order of all the interviews or articles and so forth like it has in the manual list of the bibliograph section. I fear this is planned once (although that day might never come) all interviews and articles are gathered. I think that it is an important feature to browse the articles in their chonology, but in the automatic order when ones accesses them via the subcategories they are ordered alphabetically, which doesn't make sense really ...		As you are one of the top-level admins, I guess – let me beg you not ever to loose the chronological order of all the interviews or articles and so forth like it has in the manual list of the bibliograph section. I fear this is planned once (although that day might never come) all interviews and articles are gathered. I think that it is an important feature to browse the articles in their chonology, but in the automatic order when ones accesses them via the subcategories they are ordered alphabetically, which doesn't make sense really ...
	:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]] 12:38, 12 Apr 2007 (PDT)		:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]] 12:38, 12 Apr 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+
		+	I think we will eventually need [[wikipedia:Category:1969\|a year category]] so that the chronology of everything can be followed.
		+
		+
		+	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 23:42, 12 Apr 2007 (PDT)

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 :[[User:Propellerkuh|Propellerkuh]]Propellerkuh
+==Manual vs. automatical categorizing==
 Hi MDB<br>
 As you are one of the top-level admins, I guess – let me beg you not ever to loose the chronological order of all the interviews or articles and so forth like it has in the manual list of the bibliograph section. I fear this is planned once (although that day might never come) all interviews and articles are gathered. I think that it is an important feature to browse the articles in their chonology, but in the automatic order when ones accesses them via the subcategories they are ordered alphabetically, which doesn't make sense really ...
 :[[User:Propellerkuh|Propellerkuh]] 12:38, 12 Apr 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 12 April 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:

	:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]]Propellerkuh		:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]]Propellerkuh
		+
		+	Hi MDB<br>
		+	As you are one of the top-level admins, I guess – let me beg you not ever to loose the chronological order of all the interviews or articles and so forth like it has in the manual list of the bibliograph section. I fear this is planned once (although that day might never come) all interviews and articles are gathered. I think that it is an important feature to browse the articles in their chonology, but in the automatic order when ones accesses them via the subcategories they are ordered alphabetically, which doesn't make sense really ...
		+	:[[User:Propellerkuh\|Propellerkuh]] 12:38, 12 Apr 2007 (PDT)