Talk:We're Only In It For The Money - Revision history

Fishbrain at 14:16, 28 January 2010

2010-01-28T14:16:11Z

2007-10-29T19:27:11Z

Cover Art

2007-10-29T18:59:31Z

Cover Art

2006-04-21T10:11:24Z

2006-04-21T05:28:38Z

2006-04-21T02:51:09Z

2005-09-04T07:34:00Z

Cover Art

2005-09-04T06:38:12Z

2005-09-03T21:55:47Z

Cover Art

2005-05-01T17:56:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 28 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Release date ==
		+	Info box: "Released March 1968"<br>
		+	Release notes: "Originally released in September 1968."<br>
		+	What's up with that? What's the right date?<br>
		+	--[[User:Fishbrain\|Fishbrain]] 06:16, 28 January 2010 (PST)
		+
		+
	== HELP! ==		== HELP! ==
	I have linked this release countless times in the Musicians category, only now to discover that not all of the words in the title were Capitalized - which I assumed was the convention; or, at least, it should be. Is it possible to change this article title, rather than go back and change the 65 entries I've made? Please?		I have linked this release countless times in the Musicians category, only now to discover that not all of the words in the title were Capitalized - which I assumed was the convention; or, at least, it should be. Is it possible to change this article title, rather than go back and change the 65 entries I've made? Please?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 29 October 2007
Line 50:		Line 50:

	[[User:Maroual\|Maroual]] 11:59, 29 October 2007 (PDT)		[[User:Maroual\|Maroual]] 11:59, 29 October 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	We could have it as well as the original version - but I do think it is worth documenting how it originally appeared. Also we do not seem to mention the cut out badges etc. that came with the original LP .
		+
		+	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 12:27, 29 October 2007 (PDT)

	==Value of Background Info==		==Value of Background Info==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 29 October 2007
Line 41:		Line 41:

	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 00:34, 4 Sep 2005 (PDT)		[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 00:34, 4 Sep 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+
		+	Hi [[User:Duncan\|Duncan]],
		+
		+	This new picture of the inside cover art is really cool.
		+
		+	However, if you don't mind, I guess it does still make sense to show the Ryko CD front cover because it's the way it is usually seen (even if a bit redundant).
		+
		+	[[User:Maroual\|Maroual]] 11:59, 29 October 2007 (PDT)

	==Value of Background Info==		==Value of Background Info==

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 21 April 2006
Line 56:		Line 56:

	That is what the Edit tab is for. Feel free to jump in and put it right. I do agree with you much of that stuff is factually inaccurate and/or opinion presented as fact. I have been trimming/removing chunks of it and will continue to do so. [[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 22:28, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT)		That is what the Edit tab is for. Feel free to jump in and put it right. I do agree with you much of that stuff is factually inaccurate and/or opinion presented as fact. I have been trimming/removing chunks of it and will continue to do so. [[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 22:28, 20 Apr 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	I agree with you [[User:Duncan\|Duncan]].
		+
		+	Should we also respect the Wikipedia's three content-guiding policy?
		+	*[[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view]]
		+	*[[Wikipedia:No original research]]
		+	*[[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]
		+	(see also [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources]] & [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]])
		+
		+	They really contain good piece of advice on how to deal with facts BUT I guess we should have our '''own version''' as some of us might have precious information that is NOT available elsewhere...
		+
		+	[[User:Maroual\|Maroual]] 03:11, 21 Apr 2006 (PDT)

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 00:34, 4 Sep 2005 (PDT)
 OK, like, there's to much assumtion in all this...  Jimmy Carl Black's "Indian of the group" thing is a sample, it's not different from the first time to the second time.  Stop creating YOUR version of what happened at the session that you were not present at.
@@ Line 49: / Line 53: @@
 WRITE WHAT YOU KNOW!!!!  NOT WHAT YOU THINK!!!

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 21 April 2006
Line 41:		Line 41:

	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 00:34, 4 Sep 2005 (PDT)		[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 00:34, 4 Sep 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+	OK, like, there's to much assumtion in all this... Jimmy Carl Black's "Indian of the group" thing is a sample, it's not different from the first time to the second time. Stop creating YOUR version of what happened at the session that you were not present at.
		+
		+	It is well known that Frank used to tape EVERYTHING, including everyday conversations between him and his bandmates. It seems to me this is a spliced in piece of one of those conversations.
		+
		+	Suggesting that EVERY FUCKING SECOND of any of Frank's albums is a planned affair is to deny the spontaneousness of the rock and roll genre, and I think Frank would probably laugh in your face for thinking otherwise.
		+
		+	WRITE WHAT YOU KNOW!!!! NOT WHAT YOU THINK!!!

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:34, 4 September 2005
Line 37:		Line 37:
	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 14:55, 3 Sep 2005 (PDT)		[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 14:55, 3 Sep 2005 (PDT)
	* Two things: (1) I only have the CD-releases and (2) it's going to be very hard scanning vynil covers as my (and most, I figure) scanner only handles A4+. I understand the desire for original artwork though - it's just a matter of how... - [[User:KillUglyRadio\|KillUglyRadio]] 23:38, 3 Sep 2005 (PDT)		* Two things: (1) I only have the CD-releases and (2) it's going to be very hard scanning vynil covers as my (and most, I figure) scanner only handles A4+. I understand the desire for original artwork though - it's just a matter of how... - [[User:KillUglyRadio\|KillUglyRadio]] 23:38, 3 Sep 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+	My [http://wiki.killuglyradio.com/index.php/Threesome_No._1 CD version] has the cover the original way round. I guess yours would have the original (back to front outside inside) outside cover on the inside. Or something like that :-)
		+
		+	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 00:34, 4 Sep 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:38, 4 September 2005
Line 34:		Line 34:

	If we are having the original release date (should these be original US release dates?) should we not also have original cover art?		If we are having the original release date (should these be original US release dates?) should we not also have original cover art?
−

	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 14:55, 3 Sep 2005 (PDT)		[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 14:55, 3 Sep 2005 (PDT)
		+	* Two things: (1) I only have the CD-releases and (2) it's going to be very hard scanning vynil covers as my (and most, I figure) scanner only handles A4+. I understand the desire for original artwork though - it's just a matter of how... - [[User:KillUglyRadio\|KillUglyRadio]] 23:38, 3 Sep 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 3 September 2005
Line 30:		Line 30:

	One more time for the world: wouldn't it be better to put track-related information on the track pages? - emdebe		One more time for the world: wouldn't it be better to put track-related information on the track pages? - emdebe
		+
		+	== Cover Art ==
		+
		+	If we are having the original release date (should these be original US release dates?) should we not also have original cover art?
		+
		+
		+	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 14:55, 3 Sep 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 1 May 2005
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Wouldn't it be better to put track-related information on the track pages? Since a track can be on different albums in different versions, it is perhaps key to mention what track version is being documented on the track page... - emdebe		Wouldn't it be better to put track-related information on the track pages? Since a track can be on different albums in different versions, it is perhaps key to mention what track version is being documented on the track page... - emdebe
		+
		+	One more time for the world: wouldn't it be better to put track-related information on the track pages? - emdebe