Talk:Mystery Disc - Revision history

Emdebe: Not the best way to try and work things out, is it?

2005-08-16T19:38:37Z

Not the best way to try and work things out, is it?

Duncan at 06:17, 15 August 2005

2005-08-15T06:17:40Z

Emdebe: just to confuse the Russians?

2005-08-14T17:24:42Z

just to confuse the Russians?

Duncan at 05:59, 14 August 2005

2005-08-14T05:59:00Z

Emdebe at 21:08, 24 March 2005

2005-03-24T21:08:33Z

New page

There was a "Mystery Disc" in 1985, together with the first "Old Masters". There was a "Mystery Disc 2" in 1986, together with the second "Old Masters". And then there was the "Mystery Disc" CD... emdebe

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 It doesn't have to be: that's what "disambiguation pages" are for, I guess... There are after all 2 seperate albums (LPs) and only 1 CD, right? --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 13:15, 7 Aug 2005 (PDT)
 If we are excluding obscure Japanese versions...
@@ Line 46: / Line 45: @@
 Feel free to continue to do whatever it is that you want to do here.
-[[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 23:17, 14 Aug 2005 (PDT)
+---

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:17, 15 August 2005
Line 35:		Line 35:

	So, some time ago (see above), you were frustrated because there were multiple pages.<br> Now you are frustrated because there is only one page.<br> Is this becoming a hobby, or something?<br> What exactly is it what you want?<br> Why can't you just recreate the CD track list, if it means so much to you?<br>--[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 10:24, 14 Aug 2005 (PDT)		So, some time ago (see above), you were frustrated because there were multiple pages.<br> Now you are frustrated because there is only one page.<br> Is this becoming a hobby, or something?<br> What exactly is it what you want?<br> Why can't you just recreate the CD track list, if it means so much to you?<br>--[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 10:24, 14 Aug 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+	---
		+
		+	Where? Where do you see me objecting to multiple pages. I have always argued for a page per disc - that way you end up with a Discography rather than the Title-ography that we have now (or even worse a Some-title-that-is-vaguely-similar-ography)
		+
		+	I did add the CD track listing but you decided to delete them.
		+
		+	Once again.... I give up!
		+
		+	Feel free to continue to do whatever it is that you want to do here.
		+
		+
		+	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 23:17, 14 Aug 2005 (PDT)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ----
 So why do they not have their own pages?  Why delete the track listing for the CD version when that is the version that most people will have and the version they can still buy today?  Why is this discography a constant source of frustration for me? Why should I (or anybody else) bother with any of this?
 [[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 22:59, 13 Aug 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:59, 14 August 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There was a "Mystery Disc" in 1985, together with the first "Old Masters". There was a "Mystery Disc 2" in 1986, together with the second "Old Masters". And then there was the "Mystery Disc" CD... emdebe		There was a "Mystery Disc" in 1985, together with the first "Old Masters". There was a "Mystery Disc 2" in 1986, together with the second "Old Masters". And then there was the "Mystery Disc" CD... emdebe
		+
		+	----
		+
		+
		+	So why do they not have their own pages? Why delete the track listing for the CD version when that is the version that most people will have and the version they can still buy today? Why is this discography a constant source of frustration for me? Why should I (or anybody else) bother with any of this?
		+
		+	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 22:59, 13 Aug 2005 (PDT)