Talk:Lumpy Gravy - Revision history

Duncan: UK Mono version

2006-08-16T11:15:13Z

UK Mono version

Dunk at 22:16, 30 May 2005

2005-05-30T22:16:47Z

Emdebe at 21:48, 30 May 2005

2005-05-30T21:48:48Z

Emdebe at 17:50, 30 May 2005

2005-05-30T17:50:17Z

Dunk at 16:22, 30 May 2005

2005-05-30T16:22:42Z

Emdebe at 16:04, 30 May 2005

2005-05-30T16:04:58Z

New page

Not exactly my idea of a "disambiguation page", and when I look at your example at the KUR Forum, it's... different... ;-) --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 09:04, 30 May 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 16 August 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	[[User:Dunk\|Dunk]] 15:16, 30 May 2005 (PDT)		[[User:Dunk\|Dunk]] 15:16, 30 May 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+	== UK Mono version ==
		+
		+	http://www.vinylrecords.co.uk/Top200.html
		+
		+	is listing VLP9223 as UK Mono version.
		+
		+	[[User:Duncan\|Duncan]] 04:15, 16 Aug 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 30 May 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:
	----		----
	Wouldn't "Lumpy Gravy (The Verve Version)" and "Lumpy Gravy (The Capitol Version)" be better than "Lumpy Gravy (The Album)" and "Lumpy Gravy (The Cartridge)"? --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 14:48, 30 May 2005 (PDT)		Wouldn't "Lumpy Gravy (The Verve Version)" and "Lumpy Gravy (The Capitol Version)" be better than "Lumpy Gravy (The Album)" and "Lumpy Gravy (The Cartridge)"? --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 14:48, 30 May 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	I have never liked any of them. Wouldn't Lumpy Gravy (V whatever the cat. no. was) be better? I would have been happy with Lumpy Gravy Restaurant rather than the contrived Lumpy Gravy (The Restaurant) that we have had imposed upon us ;-)
		+
		+	It could be argued that the Verve version contains a large chunk of the Capitol version after MGM acquired the tapes - and that the Capitol version exists exclusively on the cartridge issue: so (The Cartridge) is less ambiguous than (The Capitol Vaersion)
		+
		+	[[User:Dunk\|Dunk]] 15:16, 30 May 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 30 May 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	----		----
	Something like [[You Can't Do That On Stage Anymore]] then... I think, eventually, I could get used to that, but we need a bit of consistency, I guess... Or do we take a different each time, just to confuse the Russians? ;-) --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 10:50, 30 May 2005 (PDT)		Something like [[You Can't Do That On Stage Anymore]] then... I think, eventually, I could get used to that, but we need a bit of consistency, I guess... Or do we take a different each time, just to confuse the Russians? ;-) --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 10:50, 30 May 2005 (PDT)
		+	----
		+	Wouldn't "Lumpy Gravy (The Verve Version)" and "Lumpy Gravy (The Capitol Version)" be better than "Lumpy Gravy (The Album)" and "Lumpy Gravy (The Cartridge)"? --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 14:48, 30 May 2005 (PDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Not exactly my idea of a "disambiguation page", and when I look at your example at the KUR Forum, it's... different... ;-) --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 09:04, 30 May 2005 (PDT)
 ----
 Hardly seemed worth a whole page just for a couple of links - but that whole disambiguation page will come ;-)
 [[User:Dunk|Dunk]] 09:22, 30 May 2005 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 30 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Not exactly my idea of a "disambiguation page", and when I look at your example at the KUR Forum, it's... different... ;-) --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 09:04, 30 May 2005 (PDT)		Not exactly my idea of a "disambiguation page", and when I look at your example at the KUR Forum, it's... different... ;-) --[[User:Emdebe\|Emdebe]] 09:04, 30 May 2005 (PDT)
		+
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	Hardly seemed worth a whole page just for a couple of links - but that whole disambiguation page will come ;-)
		+
		+
		+	[[User:Dunk\|Dunk]] 09:22, 30 May 2005 (PDT)