Difference between revisions of "Zappa Wiki Jawaka talk:Image use policy"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 11:41, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT) | --[[User:Emdebe|Emdebe]] 11:41, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Should we make all the articles the same size too? You can make the images clickable thumbnails which may be preferable. | ||
| + | [[User:Dunk|Dunk]] 15:25, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT) | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
| + | Naaah I don't think we need to impose px dimensions on regular pictures, since the unpredictable nature of the pic (might be a close-up, might be a building, etc) makes it hard to impose a standard - plus there's the option of thumbnailing the picture. Album cover art though: there I think we have to impose the 150x150px standard. | ||
| − | [[User: | + | [[User:KillUglyRadio|KillUglyRadio]] 10:11, 4 Jun 2005 (PDT) |
Revision as of 10:11, 4 June 2005
"When uploading album cover art adhere to a size of 150x150px if you can."
Maybe it would be a good thing to limit the size of other "illustrations" as well...
There are some HUGE pictures in there (Johnny Otis is a case in point)...
Can we go for a "one size fits all"?
--Emdebe 11:41, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT)
Should we make all the articles the same size too? You can make the images clickable thumbnails which may be preferable.
Dunk 15:25, 3 Jun 2005 (PDT)
Naaah I don't think we need to impose px dimensions on regular pictures, since the unpredictable nature of the pic (might be a close-up, might be a building, etc) makes it hard to impose a standard - plus there's the option of thumbnailing the picture. Album cover art though: there I think we have to impose the 150x150px standard.
KillUglyRadio 10:11, 4 Jun 2005 (PDT)
