User talk:Spider of Destiny
Welcome
Hello Spider of Destiny and welcome to the Wiki Jawaka,
Many thanks for your contributions.
I learned a lot of things from your edits, you seem to have a wide culture.
As you probably noticed, I made a few changes following yours.
This in order to comply with the general philosophy we are trying to maintain here.
So I will have only a few remarks regarding your forthcoming changes, if you are open to suggestions:
- Could you please try to add links to the Wikipedia everywhere relevant? For many subjects, the Wiki Jawaka do not pretend to become the final reference. As well, I always prefer the idea of any page here to become a starting point, instead of the final page with no more links, if you see what I mean.
- Instead of simply putting the first occurence of the page title in bold (the name of somebody, Ronald Reagan for instance), although the result will be the same, we usually prefer to put it into Wiki brackets, as if it was a link.
- In your articles, could you please try to focus as much as possible on relations to Zappa. Please do not get me wrong, I do appreciate what you did. But for instance, the sentence mentionning there was a Godzilla remake in 1998 may help to avoid confusion with former stuff. However the fact the remake disappointed many fans is likely out of this Wiki scope.
- Please try to fit in the existing templates as much as possible. I recognize that, we sometimes overrode them without always updating the template pages. They were created in order to accelerate edition, as well as to keep a consistent layout in the Wiki.
Okay, I stop bothering you ;-)
Have a nice weekend.
Maroual 01:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Indeed, I share your opinions about articles such as Bruce Springsteen, Ella Fitzgerald or John & Yoko.
I would say there is no particular policy here regarding articles deletions or merging. You just need to convince the most active members and administrators (Duncan, Emdebe, KillUglyRadio aka Barry, Propellerkuh and myself) that your actions are good and acceptable for the majority.
This is often an informal process. For instance, when I start a 'campaign', I usually start with a few examples. Then I submit a question or a discussion on the other administrators' pages, always leaving the possibility to rollback the changes. And if they like it or don't care, then I continue.
Regarding the articles mentionned above, I think there is no big risk if you delete or merge them, by the time you make sure not to leave any dead links (by clicking on the What links here option in the toolbox on the left side).
Now this could be a different story with the Conceptual Continuity (CC) articles. I have no particular objection myself, however I think you should rather have this discussion with the oldest members and founders of this Wiki (Duncan, Emdebe and KillUglyRadio aka Barry). The structure and essence of the CC articles was initiated by them (Emdebe mainly) before I start contributing. And these guys had their own philosophy of a CC network at the time. So I think you should obtain their approval or understand what they were trying to do before attempting anything.
Maroual 22:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
One more thing, could you please respect this syntax :
Title first use in the eponym article
Please prefer:
"[[Freaks]]"
instead of:
'''"Freaks"'''
Links to the Wikipedia
==See Also== *[[wikipedia:XXXXXXX|Wikipedia article on XXXXXXX]]
Links to the sister Wikipedia are a bit more than just 'External links' ;-)
Thanks :-)
Maroual 23:02, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
