Difference between revisions of "Talk:We're Only In It For The Money"

From Zappa Wiki Jawaka
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(The ears of the writer)
(Re Sofa & Duncan)
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
[[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 01:58, 24 Mar 2005 (PST)
 
[[User:Duncan|Duncan]] 01:58, 24 Mar 2005 (PST)
 +
 +
== Re Sofa & Duncan ==
 +
 +
*Sofa: I've made redirects so the ("erroneous") links you made should simply redirect to this one.
 +
*Duncan: I read somewhere at wikipedia that if you come across an article that is too biassed/personal, don't get rid of the article. Instead keep the objective stuff from the article and get rid of the bias. So that's what I would do. I agree, as a rule of thumb, there shouldn't be room here for overly opinionated content especially when it's subject to controversy...
 +
 +
-- KUR

Revision as of 03:12, 24 March 2005

HELP!

I have linked this release countless times in the Musicians category, only now to discover that not all of the words in the title were Capitalized - which I assumed was the convention; or, at least, it should be. Is it possible to change this article title, rather than go back and change the 65 entries I've made? Please?

Oh please, oh please, oh please, oh PLEASE!

--SOFA

The ears of the writer

Somewhere in the Wikipedia notes for contributors it requests that articles stick to facts rather than the opinions of individual contributors. Should we be aiming for the same thing?

It is too easy to dismiss something as pretentious without a full argument to support such a claim which of itself would be contentious. Surely all fashion is pretentious.

I am amazed someone actually finds the later remixes anything other than utterly moronic. There is an article somewhere that questions the extent of the alleged damage to the original tapes

should the Ruben paragraph be elsewhere?

Duncan 01:58, 24 Mar 2005 (PST)

Re Sofa & Duncan

  • Sofa: I've made redirects so the ("erroneous") links you made should simply redirect to this one.
  • Duncan: I read somewhere at wikipedia that if you come across an article that is too biassed/personal, don't get rid of the article. Instead keep the objective stuff from the article and get rid of the bias. So that's what I would do. I agree, as a rule of thumb, there shouldn't be room here for overly opinionated content especially when it's subject to controversy...

-- KUR