Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Composers"

From Zappa Wiki Jawaka
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Yup)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
... but then again... There's also [[Ludwig van Beethoven]]: he was definetely a "composer", but I'm not sure he was an FZ "influence" (probably NOT)... BUT he did get his picture on the cover of [[We're Only In It For The Money]]... - emdebe
 
... but then again... There's also [[Ludwig van Beethoven]]: he was definetely a "composer", but I'm not sure he was an FZ "influence" (probably NOT)... BUT he did get his picture on the cover of [[We're Only In It For The Money]]... - emdebe
 +
 +
== Yup ==
 +
 +
Correct, which is why the Composer's category is currently subcategorized under both Influences and Supporting Cast. For the Ludwig Von Beethoven page, you'd probably tag it under Supporting Cast and Composers. I suppose the individual composer-pages have to be looked at on a case-per-case basis AFA categorizing is concerned.
 +
 +
-- KUR

Revision as of 03:47, 28 March 2005

Subcategory of Influences or Supporting Cast?

Wouldn't it be better to have the "Composers" category be a subcategory of "Influences" rather than "Supporting Cast"?

-- KUR

Good thinking! A subcategory of "Influences" it is... Can we provide a space somewhere to discuss this Category / Subcategory thing? KUR Forum, perhaps? - emdebe

... but then again... There's also Ludwig van Beethoven: he was definetely a "composer", but I'm not sure he was an FZ "influence" (probably NOT)... BUT he did get his picture on the cover of We're Only In It For The Money... - emdebe

Yup

Correct, which is why the Composer's category is currently subcategorized under both Influences and Supporting Cast. For the Ludwig Von Beethoven page, you'd probably tag it under Supporting Cast and Composers. I suppose the individual composer-pages have to be looked at on a case-per-case basis AFA categorizing is concerned.

-- KUR